Web Accessibility audit for Refuge Network International
Web Accessibility audit for Refuge Network International
Web Accessibility audit for Refuge Network International
I conducted an expert accessibility review of the Refuge Network International website (https://www.refugenetworkinternational.com/). Refuge Network International is dedicated to supporting refugees and asylum seekers, providing crucial resources and assistance. Given their mission to help vulnerable populations, it's paramount that their website is accessible to all users, including those with disabilities.
I conducted an expert accessibility review of the Refuge Network International website (https://www.refugenetworkinternational.com/). Refuge Network International is dedicated to supporting refugees and asylum seekers, providing crucial resources and assistance. Given their mission to help vulnerable populations, it's paramount that their website is accessible to all users, including those with disabilities.
Scroll to explore

Client:
Client:
Royal Opera House
Royal Opera House
Dates:
Dates:
February - March 2023
February - March 2023
Role:
Role:
Accessibility specialist
Accessibility specialist
Skills:
Skills:
Accessibility audit, Expert review, WCAG Guideline, HTML, CSS, Assistive technology checks
Accessibility audit, Expert review, WCAG Guideline, HTML, CSS, Assistive technology checks
Objective
Objective
The primary goal was to evaluate the accessibility of their website for people with access needs and identify the most critical steps to improve accessibility. This review focused on two key pages:
The primary goal was to evaluate the accessibility of their website for people with access needs and identify the most critical steps to improve accessibility. This review focused on two key pages:
Methodology
Methodology
My comprehensive approach included:
Automatic checks using WAVE
Software used: WAVE accessibility evaluation tool
Purpose: Highlighting potential errors in the HTML code and user interface
Manual checks
Guideline used: WCAG 2.2 (up to conformance level AA)
Methods used: W3C's manual 'Easy Checks' and Gov.uk's basic accessibility check
Process: Manually inspecting the HTML code, user interface, contrast, labels, alternative text, and links
Assistive technology checks
Software used: VoiceOver screen-reader
Methods used: Keyboard tabbing
Purpose: Checked compliance with WCAG 2.2 and accessibility for users of screen readers and keyboard navigation
Review period: 15 Nov - 16 Dec 2023
Platforms tested: macOS Sonoma (Version 14.0), Google Chrome (Version 120.0.6099.71)
My comprehensive approach included:
Automatic checks using WAVE
Software used: WAVE accessibility evaluation tool
Purpose: Highlighting potential errors in the HTML code and user interface
Manual checks
Guideline used: WCAG 2.2 (up to conformance level AA)
Methods used: W3C's manual 'Easy Checks' and Gov.uk's basic accessibility check
Process: Manually inspecting the HTML code, user interface, contrast, labels, alternative text, and links
Assistive technology checks
Software used: VoiceOver screen-reader
Methods used: Keyboard tabbing
Purpose: Checked compliance with WCAG 2.2 and accessibility for users of screen readers and keyboard navigation
Review period: 15 Nov - 16 Dec 2023
Platforms tested: macOS Sonoma (Version 14.0), Google Chrome (Version 120.0.6099.71)
Key Findings
Key Findings
I identified and prioritized the 10 most severe accessibility issues, including:
Improper use of semantic markup
Ambiguous link text
Insufficient form assistance
Lack of video controls
Missing or inaccurate text alternatives for images
I identified and prioritized the 10 most severe accessibility issues, including:
Improper use of semantic markup
Ambiguous link text
Insufficient form assistance
Lack of video controls
Missing or inaccurate text alternatives for images
Each issue was assigned a severity rating using an adapted version of Rubin's four-point scale, ranging from Level 1 (Irritant) to Level 4 (Unusable).
Each issue was assigned a severity rating using an adapted version of Rubin's four-point scale, ranging from Level 1 (Irritant) to Level 4 (Unusable).



For each identified issue, I provided a detailed analysis:
Description of the problem
Location on the website
Impact on users with different needs
Severity rating (using an adapted version of Rubin's four-point scale)
Specific WCAG 2.2 guidelines violated
Recommended solutions
Here's a sample from the report:
For each identified issue, I provided a detailed analysis:
Description of the problem
Location on the website
Impact on users with different needs
Severity rating (using an adapted version of Rubin's four-point scale)
Specific WCAG 2.2 guidelines violated
Recommended solutions
Here's a sample from the report:



Outcome and Impact
Outcome and Impact
This project not only enhanced my skills in conducting accessibility audits but also provided Refuge Network International with:
A clear roadmap for improving their website's accessibility
Insights into the diverse needs of their users
Actionable recommendations to create a more inclusive online presence
By addressing these issues, Refuge Network International can ensure that their vital services and information are accessible to all, regardless of ability, furthering their mission of empowering communities and addressing poverty.
This project not only enhanced my skills in conducting accessibility audits but also provided Refuge Network International with:
A clear roadmap for improving their website's accessibility
Insights into the diverse needs of their users
Actionable recommendations to create a more inclusive online presence
By addressing these issues, Refuge Network International can ensure that their vital services and information are accessible to all, regardless of ability, furthering their mission of empowering communities and addressing poverty.




A Coffee Guide Information Architecture Project
November - December 2023



A Web Solution for Real-Time Stock Tracking
February - May 2022
You may also like
You may also like